Bhutan National Lead Prevention Strategy

type

status

date

slug

summary

I. Executive Summary

The Kingdom of Bhutan faces a significant, yet largely hidden, public health crisis due to widespread lead exposure, particularly among its most vulnerable populations: young children and pregnant women. The findings of Bhutan's first National Blood Lead Level Survey (NBLLS) in 2024 are alarming, revealing that three out of four children aged 1-6 years have blood lead levels (BLLs) indicative of potentially serious health risks.1 This pervasive exposure poses a silent threat to the nation's health, well-being, and future development.3 Lead, a potent neurotoxin, inflicts irreversible damage, impairing cognitive development, reducing IQ, and contributing to behavioral problems in children, while also posing risks to pregnant women and the overall adult population.

The sources of lead exposure in Bhutan are varied and embedded in everyday life, ranging from traditional religious items like Jinlab and commonly used spices to kitchenware, toys, and paint.2 The presence of lead in culturally significant items, such as Jinlab, underscores the complexity of the challenge, requiring solutions that are not only effective but also culturally sensitive and community-supported. Addressing this issue is not merely a health concern but a national imperative, intrinsically linked to Bhutan's guiding philosophy of Gross National Happiness (GNH). The long-term consequences of lead exposure—diminished educational attainment, reduced productivity, and increased healthcare burdens—can undermine the very pillars of GNH, including psychological well-being, health, education, and living standards.

This National Lead Prevention Strategy provides an evidence-based, actionable roadmap for the Royal Government of Bhutan to address this critical challenge. It is built upon six interconnected strategic pillars:

Establishing Robust Regulatory and Policy Frameworks: Creating comprehensive national legislation to control lead in all relevant products and environmental media.

Implementing Targeted Source Control and Management Measures: Intervening directly to eliminate or reduce lead from identified high-risk sources.

Strengthening Public Health Surveillance, Screening, and Clinical Response: Enhancing the healthcare system's capacity to detect, manage, and prevent lead poisoning.

Empowering Communities through Public Awareness and Behavioral Change: Educating the public about risks and promoting protective behaviors through culturally appropriate communication.

Ensuring Effective Governance through Multi-Sectoral Collaboration and Coordination: Establishing a strong national task force and fostering collaboration among all stakeholders.

Building Sustainable National Capacity for Lead Poisoning Prevention: Developing the technical expertise, infrastructure, and human resources needed for long-term success.

Key recommendations include the urgent development and enforcement of lead standards for consumer products, particularly Jinlab, spices, paint, and toys; the establishment of a national BLL surveillance system integrated into maternal and child health programs; comprehensive public awareness campaigns tailored to diverse audiences; and the strengthening of laboratory and clinical capacities.

The implementation of this strategy will require sustained political will, dedicated resources, and a "whole-of-government" and "whole-of-society" approach. However, the returns on this investment will be profound: healthier children who can achieve their full intellectual potential, a more productive workforce, reduced healthcare expenditures, and a significant contribution to Bhutan's pursuit of Gross National Happiness. By confronting the lead poisoning crisis decisively, Bhutan can safeguard its present and future generations, ensuring a healthier and more prosperous future for all.

II. The Lead Poisoning Crisis in Bhutan: A Call for National Action

The recent emergence of data on lead exposure in Bhutan has cast a stark light on a previously under-recognized public health emergency. The findings necessitate immediate and comprehensive national action to protect the health and developmental potential of the Bhutanese population, particularly its children.

A. Unveiling the Scope: Key Findings of the 2024 National Blood Lead Level Survey (NBLLS)

Bhutan's inaugural National Blood Lead Level Survey (NBLLS), conducted in 2024, has provided the first nationally representative data on the prevalence of lead exposure, revealing a situation of grave concern.1 The survey, which included 2,959 children aged 1-6 years, 124 pregnant/breastfeeding women, and 207 children under 13 years from monastic institutions, has established an evidence baseline that underscores the urgency of the issue.1

The most striking finding is that an alarming 75.9% of children aged 1-6 years nationwide exhibit blood lead levels (BLLs) at or above 3.5 micrograms per deciliter (μg/dL) 6, a threshold recognized internationally as indicative of potentially serious health risks and requiring intervention.2 Furthermore, 51.3% of these children have BLLs ≥5 μg/dL, a level at which the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a thorough review of exposure pathways and action to reduce exposure.6 A smaller but still significant proportion, 5.7% of children, have BLLs ≥10 μg/dL, and 0.7% have BLLs ≥20 μg/dL 6, levels associated with more severe health consequences. The WHO and other health authorities emphasize that there is no known safe level of lead exposure, with even low levels capable of causing irreversible harm, particularly to the developing brains of young children.7

The problem extends beyond young children in the general population. The survey found that three out of five pregnant or breastfeeding women tested had BLLs ≥3.5 μg/dL.6 Maternal lead exposure is particularly concerning as lead readily crosses the placenta, exposing the developing fetus, and can also be transmitted through breast milk.7 Furthermore, lead stored in a mother's bones from past exposures can be mobilized during pregnancy, posing a risk even if current exposure is low.7

The situation within monastic institutions is even more acute. Among monastic children aged <13 years, an exceptionally high 84.2% were found to have BLLs ≥3.5 μg/dL, with a mean BLL of 5.9 μg/dL.6 This significantly higher prevalence compared to the general child population suggests the presence of unique or concentrated exposure pathways within these institutions, warranting specific investigation and targeted interventions. These could be related to distinct dietary practices, more frequent use of certain traditional items like Jinlab, or materials used in the living and learning environments of these institutions.

The fact that the 2024 NBLLS is Bhutan's first such national survey 1 implies a historical lack of data on this issue. The currently observed high BLLs may reflect an accumulation of exposure over many years from unregulated sources. This suggests that the adverse health impacts, particularly subtle neurodevelopmental effects, could already be widespread and may even have intergenerational consequences if maternal lead burdens have been consistently elevated. This historical data vacuum, now filled with alarming statistics, reinforces the critical need for sustained surveillance and immediate preventative action.

Table 1: Key Findings: Bhutan National Blood Lead Level Survey (2024)

Population Group	BLL ≥3.5 μg/dL (%)	BLL ≥5 μg/dL (%)	BLL ≥10 μg/dL (%)	BLL ≥20 μg/dL (%)	Mean BLL (μg/dL)	Sample Size (n)
Children 1-6 years (National)	75.9	51.3	5.7	0.7	5.2	2,959
Pregnant/Breastfeeding Women	~60% (3 out of 5)	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	124
Monastic Children (<13 years)	84.2	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	5.9	207
Children 1 year	78.8	55.2	8.4	1.0	Not specified	411
Children 2 years	78.5	55.2	7.8	0.9	Not specified	464
Children 3 years	74.0	50.4	4.7	0.6	Not specified	522
Children 4 years	73.9	52.1	6.8	1.1	Not specified	465
Children 5 years	75.2	49.2	4.2	0.7	Not specified	516
Children 6 years	75.9	47.5	3.5	0.0	Not specified	581

Source: Adapted from.1 Note: "Not specified" indicates data not available in the provided factsheet summary for that specific breakdown. Age-specific data for children 1-6 years is italicized.

This table quantifies the scale of the lead exposure problem, highlighting the vulnerability of Bhutan's youngest citizens and pregnant women. This data is foundational for prioritizing interventions, allocating resources, and establishing measurable targets for reduction. The variations by age also suggest potential differences in exposure patterns or behaviors that warrant further investigation.

B. Identifying the Culprits: Major Sources of Lead Exposure in Bhutanese Households and Environment

The NBLLS 2024 went beyond measuring blood lead levels to investigate potential sources of exposure by testing various environmental samples and consumer products using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) technology.4 The findings reveal multiple pathways through which Bhutanese citizens, particularly children, are exposed to lead in their daily lives.4

A major source of concern identified is Jinlab, traditional religious pills often consumed for blessings. The survey found that 44.3% of 767 Jinlab samples tested contained lead above the detection limit, with 44.2% exceeding the reference safety threshold of 2.5 parts per million (ppm) for consumables.4 Shockingly, one Jinlab sample registered an extraordinarily high lead concentration of 5.7%, equivalent to 57,233 ppm.4 Such extremely high levels strongly suggest the intentional addition of lead-containing compounds during the preparation of some Jinlab, rather than mere incidental contamination of raw ingredients. Lead compounds have historically been added to some traditional products for perceived properties, color, or weight.8 Addressing this requires not only identifying safer ingredients and production methods but also engaging with traditional practitioners and religious bodies to understand and potentially modify practices or beliefs that may lead to such high levels of intentional inclusion, a task that must be approached with cultural sensitivity and collaboration.5

Spices, particularly turmeric and chili powder, are another significant dietary source of lead. The survey found that 26.7% of 75 spice samples had detectable lead, and 20.0% exceeded the 2.5 ppm reference threshold.2 Lead contamination in spices can occur through adulteration to enhance color or weight, or from contaminated soil or processing equipment.9 Given that spices are consumed regularly, even low levels of contamination can contribute significantly to overall lead intake.

Kitchenware also emerged as a notable exposure source. Of 665 kitchen items tested, 45.1% had detectable lead, and 21.5% exceeded the reference threshold of 100 ppm.6 Brass and metal utensils were particularly implicated.2 Lead can leach from such utensils into food, especially acidic foods, during cooking or storage.9

Other consumer products showed varying levels of contamination:

Toys and School Items: 23.0% of 209 toys tested had detectable lead, with 9.1% exceeding the 100 ppm threshold. Among 41 school items played with or touched by children, 14.6% had detectable lead, and 9.8% exceeded the 100 ppm threshold.6 Children's mouthing behaviors make lead in toys a direct ingestion risk.

Paint: While only 0.8% of 127 new paint samples tested exceeded the international reference threshold of 90 ppm 4, this finding warrants careful interpretation. Bhutan currently lacks specific regulations governing lead content in paint.2 The survey may not have captured the full picture regarding older, legacy paint in homes, which can be a significant source of lead dust as it deteriorates.12 Given the global emphasis on eliminating lead paint as a major exposure source for children 9, and the potential for unregulated imports, proactive regulation and ongoing surveillance remain crucial.

Soil: 81.7% of 60 soil samples had detectable lead, with 3.3% exceeding the reference threshold of 200 ppm.6 Soil contamination can result from historical industrial activity, deteriorated lead paint, or past use of leaded gasoline.9

Cosmetics: Of 14 cosmetic items tested, 14.3% had detectable lead and exceeded the 10 ppm threshold.6 Some traditional cosmetics are known to contain lead.8

Beyond these specific categories, the survey highlighted a diffuse presence of lead in the general environment: 75.2% of 214 "religious items" (other than Jinlab) and 47.2% of 246 general "household items" tested positive for lead, though specific thresholds were not applied to these broad categories in the summary factsheet.6 This widespread contamination suggests that lead-containing materials may be common in the manufacturing of many everyday objects, posing a challenge for source identification and regulation that requires broad-spectrum material testing and robust import controls.

Table 2: Major Identified Sources of Lead Exposure in Bhutan and Contamination Levels (NBLLS 2024)

Item Category	Total Items Tested	% with Detectable Lead	% Exceeding Reference Threshold	*Reference Threshold (ppm)**	Notable Findings
Jinlab (Religious Pills)	767	44.3%	44.2%	2.5	One sample at 57,233 ppm (5.7%) 4
Spices	75	26.7%	20.0%	2.5	Turmeric and chili powder implicated 2
Kitchen Items	665	45.1%	21.5%	100	Brass and metal utensils of concern 4
Toys	209	23.0%	9.1%	100	ㅤ
School Items	41	14.6%	9.8%	100	Items played with/touched by children
Paint	127	29.9%	0.8%	90	Low exceedance in new paints, legacy paint a concern
Soil	60	81.7%	3.3%	200	ㅤ
Cosmetics	14	14.3%	14.3%	10	ㅤ
Religious Items (General)	214	75.2%	NA	NA	Widespread presence
Household Items (General)	246	47.2%	NA	NA	Widespread presence

Source: Adapted from.4 Reference thresholds are as used in the NBLLS 2024 factsheet. "NA" (Not Applicable) indicates a general detection rate was reported without applying a specific threshold in the summary for that broad category.

This table clearly indicates that lead exposure in Bhutan is not from a single source but from multiple, everyday items and environmental media. This necessitates a multi-pronged approach to source reduction, targeting the most hazardous and prevalent sources first.

C. The Human Cost: Health Impacts of Lead Exposure on Bhutan's Children and Population

Lead is a cumulative toxicant that affects multiple body systems, with particularly devastating and irreversible effects on the developing nervous system of fetuses, infants, and young children.3 There is no known level of lead exposure that is considered safe; even low levels of exposure can cause significant harm.7

In Bhutan, the NBLLS 2024 has already provided evidence of the detrimental effects of lead. The survey found an association between blood lead levels and developmental delays in children aged 1-5 years.5 Specifically, children with higher BLLs were more likely to experience delays in at least one developmental milestone. This direct evidence from Bhutanese children underscores that lead exposure is not an abstract threat but is actively undermining the developmental potential of the nation's youth. This finding suggests an existing, measurable burden on families and potentially on the education system, as children with developmental delays may require additional support to achieve their learning potential. This presents a strong economic argument for investing in lead prevention, complementing the undeniable health and ethical imperatives.

The health consequences of lead exposure are extensive and well-documented globally:

Neurological and Cognitive Effects in Children: Lead exposure can lead to reduced intelligence quotient (IQ) scores, learning disabilities, shortened attention spans, behavioral problems such as aggression and hyperactivity (ADHD), and impaired academic achievement.3 These effects can have lifelong implications for an individual's educational attainment and future opportunities.

Impacts on Pregnant Women and Fetuses: Maternal lead exposure can result in miscarriage, stillbirth, premature birth, and low birth weight.6 Lead crosses the placenta and can damage the fetal brain and nervous system.7

Other Health Effects in Children and Adults: Lead exposure is also linked to anemia (as it interferes with hemoglobin synthesis), kidney damage, impaired immune function, hypertension, cardiovascular disease in adulthood, and reproductive problems.3 The NBLLS 2024 also examined the association between BLLs and anemia in Bhutanese children.5

The long-term socio-economic consequences of widespread lead exposure are considerable. Reduced cognitive abilities and educational attainment can lead to lower lifetime earnings and decreased national productivity.3 Increased incidences of health problems associated with lead exposure also place a greater burden on the healthcare system. Globally, childhood lead exposure is estimated to cause substantial economic losses due to lowered intellectual ability in low- and middle-income countries.9

Bhutan has made commendable progress in improving maternal and child health (MCH) indicators over the past decades, including significant reductions in maternal and under-five mortality rates.14 However, the pervasive threat of lead exposure acts as a "silent saboteur," potentially undermining these hard-won gains. Children who survive infancy and early childhood due to improved MCH services may still fail to reach their full developmental potential if their cognitive and physical health is compromised by lead. Therefore, integrating lead poisoning prevention into existing MCH frameworks, such as the Comprehensive Mother and Child Health Programme 14, is essential to protect and build upon these achievements. The fight against lead poisoning is thus integral to securing a healthy and prosperous future for Bhutan.

III. A National Blueprint for a Lead-Safe Bhutan: Strategic Pillars for Prevention

Addressing the multifaceted challenge of lead poisoning in Bhutan requires a comprehensive, multi-pronged national strategy. Drawing upon the recommendations from the 2024 National Blood Lead Level Survey 5, international best practices 2, and an understanding of Bhutan's unique context, this blueprint proposes six strategic pillars to guide national efforts towards a lead-safe future. These pillars are interconnected and mutually reinforcing, designed to create a robust and sustainable system for preventing lead exposure and mitigating its impacts.

A. Pillar 1: Establishing Robust Regulatory and Policy Frameworks

A cornerstone of any effective lead prevention strategy is a strong legal and regulatory foundation. Currently, Bhutan lacks specific national regulations or standards governing the lead content in many consumer products, including paints, toys, cosmetics, food items, kitchen utensils, and traditional medicines.2 The importation, manufacturing, and disposal of lead-containing materials, as well as the monitoring and control of environmental lead sources, are also largely unregulated.2 This regulatory void poses significant and ongoing risks to public health and environmental safety.

The NBLLS 2024 strongly recommends the development and implementation of policies and regulations to monitor and control the import, use, and disposal of raw lead, lead compounds, alloys, and all lead-containing products that pose a risk to human health.5 This includes establishing import and regulatory policies specifically for lead in foods, spices, toys, paints, household items, and other relevant products.

Recognizing the limited in-house technical capacity within national institutions for this highly specialized work, UNICEF Bhutan has initiated the process of engaging a national consultant to develop comprehensive regulations for the prevention of environmental lead exposure.2 This consultancy is tasked with conducting a thorough desk review of existing national policies, laws, and institutional mandates pertaining to lead; performing a national gap analysis of the regulatory framework; drafting comprehensive environmental regulations for lead (including permissible levels in air, water, soil, and consumer products) aligned with international best practices and Bhutan's environmental policies; facilitating extensive stakeholder consultations with government agencies, industries, and civil society; and ultimately, preparing a roadmap for the implementation of these new lead regulations, including institutional arrangements, monitoring and enforcement mechanisms, and capacity-building needs.11 This structured process of regulation development offers a valuable opportunity not only to create effective laws but also to build national consensus and ownership across diverse sectors. Involving stakeholders from the outset is crucial for ensuring that the resulting regulations are practical, implementable, and widely supported, which in turn enhances long-term compliance and enforcement.

While Bhutan has a foundational environmental protection framework, including for the mining sector 16, this framework has gaps and fragmentation, particularly concerning the monitoring and management of heavy metals from industrial activities.16 New lead-specific regulations must be integrated with, and where necessary, strengthen these existing frameworks. Furthermore, the success of new lead laws will depend on the overall strength and capacity of Bhutan's regulatory ecosystem. Addressing underlying challenges such as resource limitations for monitoring and enforcement, which have been noted in other sectors like mining 16, will be crucial for the effective implementation of lead-specific regulations. Thus, this pillar also implicitly calls for a broader strengthening of regulatory governance and enforcement capacity across relevant agencies.

B. Pillar 2: Implementing Targeted Source Control and Management Measures

While regulatory frameworks provide the legal basis for action, specific interventions are needed to control and manage the identified sources of lead exposure. This pillar focuses on practical measures to reduce lead in high-risk products and environments, directly addressing the findings of the NBLLS.4

A top priority is addressing lead in Jinlab (traditional religious pills). Given its widespread consumption and the extremely high lead levels found in some samples 4, immediate action is required. This includes collaborating closely with Jinlab producers, including Menjong Sorig Pharmaceuticals, and relevant religious institutions to identify the precise sources of lead contamination—whether in raw ingredients, processing methods, or intentional additions.5 The goal is to support the development and adoption of lead-free formulations and production methods that maintain cultural and religious integrity. This collaborative approach, rather than a purely punitive one, is more likely to achieve sustainable change for such a culturally sensitive item. Strategies for the safe management or disposal of existing high-lead Jinlab stocks will also need to be developed.

For spices, particularly turmeric and chili powder, the strategy involves expanded testing programs to identify contaminated products, determine their origin (local production vs. importation), and pinpoint adulteration points in the supply chain.4 Regulatory action to remove contaminated spices from the market and ongoing monitoring will be essential. If contamination occurs through imported spices, this will necessitate strengthening import controls and potentially engaging in cross-border collaboration with source countries, adding a layer of complexity involving trade and customs authorities.

Lead in paint is a major global concern, and Bhutan should align with international efforts to eliminate it. This includes formally adopting and enforcing a strict limit of 90 parts per million (ppm) for lead in all paints sold and used in Bhutan, as recommended by the WHO and the Global Alliance to Eliminate Lead Paint.9 Support should be provided to local paint manufacturers, if any, to reformulate their products using lead-free alternatives, drawing on available technical guidelines.13 Public awareness campaigns will also be needed to educate consumers and painters about the importance of using lead-safe paints.

For kitchenware, public education is needed regarding the risks associated with certain types of traditional brass, aluminum, or improperly glazed ceramic cookware, which can leach lead into food.4 Promoting the use of certified lead-free cookware and establishing testing and regulatory standards for both locally made and imported kitchen items are important steps.

Regulations and enforcement are also needed for toys and other children's products, setting strict limits on lead content to protect children from exposure through mouthing or handling.6

Electronic waste (e-waste) is an emerging source of lead and other heavy metals in many developing countries.8 Bhutan needs to implement effective e-waste management strategies, including regulations for safe collection, recycling, and disposal, to prevent environmental contamination.2 Similarly, industrial activities involving lead or potentially releasing lead as a byproduct must be strictly regulated and monitored. This includes addressing the identified gaps in the mining sector's environmental management, such as weak monitoring and an outdated legal framework 16, to ensure that mining and other industrial operations do not contribute to lead pollution.

C. Pillar 3: Strengthening Public Health Surveillance, Screening, and Clinical Response

A robust public health system is critical for identifying individuals affected by lead poisoning, providing appropriate care, and monitoring the effectiveness of prevention efforts. This pillar focuses on enhancing Bhutan's capacity in these areas.

A key component is the establishment of an ongoing blood lead level (BLL) surveillance system, particularly targeting high-risk populations such as children under six years and pregnant women.3 This system will track BLL trends over time, identify high-risk geographic areas or sub-populations, and evaluate the impact of interventions. Data from this surveillance will be crucial for adaptive management of the national strategy.

Lead exposure assessment and BLL testing should be integrated into routine maternal and child health services. This includes screening children at key developmental ages (e.g., at 1 and 2 years, with annual risk assessments up to age 6, as recommended by international guidelines 12) and assessing pregnant women for lead exposure during their first prenatal visit.12 Bhutan's "1000 Golden Days initiative," which provides conditional cash incentives to encourage participation in essential health services 14, offers a unique and promising platform. Integrating lead screening and education into this initiative could significantly boost uptake among pregnant women and young children, enabling early detection and intervention during the most critical period of development.

National clinical management guidelines for lead poisoning must be developed and disseminated. These guidelines should be based on current evidence and international recommendations, such as those from the WHO 7 and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).18 They should provide clear protocols for healthcare providers on actions to take at different BLLs, including confirmatory testing, environmental exposure assessment, nutritional counseling (emphasizing adequate intake of iron, calcium, and Vitamin C, which can help mitigate lead absorption and effects 17), developmental screening for exposed children, criteria for chelation therapy in severe cases, and follow-up schedules. Given that Bhutan currently lacks a comprehensive national strategy for lead prevention 3 and is only now beginning the process of developing specific regulations 2, it is likely that detailed clinical management guidelines are also underdeveloped. Building this clinical capacity in parallel with regulatory and source control efforts is therefore essential for a holistic response.

Training for healthcare workers at all levels—from specialists to primary care physicians, nurses, and Village Health Workers—is paramount.4 They need to be knowledgeable about the sources of lead exposure, health effects, diagnosis, management, and prevention strategies to effectively care for patients and advise the public. The current initiative to train toxicologists in heavy metal detection is a positive step in this direction.4

Finally, laboratory capacity for BLL testing and environmental lead analysis needs significant enhancement.4 This includes equipping laboratories with appropriate technology, ensuring a supply of reagents and consumables, training laboratory personnel, and establishing quality assurance programs to ensure accurate and reliable results. The widespread nature of the problem, with 76% of young children having BLLs ≥3.5 μg/dL 2, means the healthcare system could face a surge in demand for testing and follow-up. A phased approach to screening, perhaps prioritizing the highest-risk Dzongkhags (as indicated by NBLLS mean BLL data 6) or the youngest age cohorts, might be necessary to manage resources effectively, especially considering Bhutan's rugged terrain and existing resource constraints.14

D. Pillar 4: Empowering Communities through Public Awareness and Behavioral Change

Effective lead poisoning prevention requires not only top-down regulatory measures but also bottom-up community engagement and behavioral change. This pillar focuses on empowering individuals and communities with the knowledge and tools to protect themselves and their children from lead exposure. Public awareness campaigns are a consistently recommended component of lead prevention strategies.2

A comprehensive national communication strategy should be developed, utilizing resources such as UNICEF's "Lead-Free Future Toolkit," particularly "Tool 5: Clear communication to prevent and address childhood lead poisoning".10 This toolkit provides guidance on tailoring messages for different target audiences, including policymakers, service providers (health workers, teachers), caregivers (parents, guardians), and the private sector.

Key messages should be clear, concise, culturally appropriate, and actionable. They should cover:

The serious and irreversible health risks of lead exposure, especially to children's brain development and pregnant women.

Common local sources of lead identified in Bhutan (e.g., Jinlab, certain spices, traditional cookware, old paint, some toys).

Simple, practical prevention measures that families can take, such as frequent handwashing (especially before eating and after playing), regular wet mopping and dusting of homes to reduce lead dust, safe food preparation and storage practices, and avoiding or replacing known high-lead products.12

The importance of BLL testing for children and pregnant women, and where to seek advice and support.

Information on safer alternatives for products known to contain lead.

Communication regarding culturally significant items like Jinlab requires exceptional nuance and sensitivity. Messages should avoid causing undue alarm or disrespecting traditional beliefs but rather focus on health and safety, potentially involving respected religious leaders or traditional medicine practitioners to explain the risks and endorse safer, lead-free alternatives.8 This collaborative approach is more likely to foster trust and encourage positive change.

A variety of communication channels should be employed to reach diverse segments of the population. These include mass media (radio, television, newspapers like Kuensel 4), social media platforms, community meetings, educational materials distributed through schools and health facilities, and engagement with religious institutions. Bhutan's extensive network of Village Health Workers (VHWs), who play a vital role in reaching rural communities and promoting health behaviors 14, should be trained and equipped to serve as key communicators on lead poisoning prevention. Their established trust within communities makes them invaluable assets in this effort.

Public awareness campaigns should also aim to empower consumers to demand safer products, thereby creating market pressure on manufacturers and importers to comply with lead standards. This can complement regulatory enforcement by fostering a market preference for lead-free goods. The Competition and Consumer Affairs Authority (CCAA), which has a mandate for consumer empowerment 20, can play a role in this aspect.

Ultimately, communication strategies must go beyond simple information dissemination. They should address potential fear or stigma associated with lead poisoning, especially when common household items or traditional practices are implicated. Messaging should be empowering, focusing on actionable solutions, collective responsibility, and the understanding that lead poisoning is a preventable and solvable problem with concerted community effort.10

E. Pillar 5: Ensuring Effective Governance through Multi-Sectoral Collaboration and Coordination

Addressing a pervasive environmental health issue like lead poisoning, which cuts across numerous sectors, necessitates a robust governance structure characterized by strong multi-sectoral collaboration and coordination. No single agency can tackle this challenge alone.

The formation of a National Lead Prevention Task Force, as recommended by the NBLLS 5 and already being initiated by the Ministry of Health 4, is a critical first step. This Task Force should serve as the central coordinating body for the development, implementation, and oversight of the National Lead Prevention Strategy. To ensure its effectiveness and sustained high-level commitment, the Task Force should ideally be chaired by a very senior government official (e.g., the Minister of Health or a representative from the Prime Minister's Office) and be supported by a dedicated secretariat with full-time staff to manage its operations and ensure follow-through on decisions. This structure can help overcome common challenges in public health initiatives, such as insufficient management support or poor inter-agency collaboration, which have been noted as systemic issues in other contexts.21

The Task Force must have broad representation from all key stakeholders. This includes:

Government Ministries and Agencies: Ministry of Health (likely the lead agency), National Environment Commission Secretariat (NECS), Competition and Consumer Affairs Authority (CCAA), Bhutan Food and Drug Authority (BFDA), Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Employment (MoICE, encompassing trade and industry), Department of Revenue and Customs, Department of Local Governance, Ministry of Education and Skills Development, and the Gross National Happiness Commission.

Religious Bodies: Particularly the Central Monastic Body, given the findings related to Jinlab and monastic children.1

Private Sector: Associations representing manufacturers, importers, and retailers of potentially lead-containing products.

Civil Society Organizations (CSOs): NGOs working on health, environment, or child welfare.

Academic and Research Institutions: To provide technical expertise and support research efforts.

International Partners: Organizations like UNICEF and WHO, which are already providing support.1

Clear Terms of Reference (ToR) for the Task Force are essential, outlining its mandate, authority, reporting structure, and operational budget. Crucially, the ToR should define specific roles and responsibilities for each member agency (as detailed in Table 4), ensuring accountability and preventing duplication of effort or critical gaps in the national response. Mechanisms for regular inter-agency communication, data sharing, joint planning, and conflict resolution must be established. The Task Force's mandate should also explicitly include public reporting on progress, challenges, and BLL trends to ensure transparency and maintain public engagement.

The National Environment Commission Secretariat (NECS) has a mandate for environmental protection, including managing water resources, biodiversity, and waste, and aims to regulate environmental impacts.23 However, its specific role and capacity concerning chemical safety and the control of heavy metal pollution from diffuse sources like consumer products (beyond mining waste 16) may need to be explicitly defined and potentially strengthened within this national strategy. Similarly, the CCAA's role in consumer protection and preventing unfair trade practices like food adulteration 20, and the BFDA's mandate to regulate the quality, safety, and efficacy of medicinal products (including traditional medicines like Jinlab) and food 4, are central to controlling lead in consumer goods. Effective coordination through the Task Force will be key to leveraging these existing mandates.

F. Pillar 6: Building Sustainable National Capacity for Lead Poisoning Prevention

The long-term success of Bhutan's lead prevention efforts hinges on building sustainable national capacity across multiple domains. The current reliance on external expertise for specialized tasks, such as the development of regulations 2, highlights the need for strategic investments in human resources, technical skills, and infrastructure.

A comprehensive national capacity assessment should be undertaken to identify specific gaps in technical skills (e.g., toxicology, epidemiology, analytical chemistry, environmental health inspection, risk assessment), laboratory equipment, and institutional capabilities for lead poisoning prevention and control. Based on this assessment, a long-term human resource development plan should be formulated. This plan should go beyond one-off trainings to establish sustainable academic and vocational programs, potentially in partnership with international institutions, to create a continuous pipeline of skilled professionals. Key components include:

Specialized training programs for healthcare professionals in clinical toxicology, diagnosis, and management of lead poisoning. The ongoing training of two toxicologists is a good start but needs to be scaled up.4

Training for environmental health officers in exposure assessment, source identification, and remediation techniques.

Training for laboratory technicians in advanced analytical methods for BLL measurement and environmental lead testing.

Training for regulatory inspectors (from agencies like BFDA, CCAA, NECS, Customs) on enforcing lead standards and conducting market surveillance.

Integration of lead poisoning prevention, environmental health, and chemical safety into the pre-service curricula of medical, nursing, public health, and environmental science schools and training institutions.5

Laboratory infrastructure requires significant upgrading. This includes:

Equipping a national reference laboratory and potentially regional laboratories with advanced instrumentation (e.g., Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) or Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (GFAAS)) for accurate BLL testing.

Providing portable X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzers for rapid, cost-effective field screening of paint, toys, soil, consumer products, and environmental samples.5 The development of standardized XRF testing protocols and quality assurance systems is essential to ensure the reliability of data from these instruments.

Establishing robust quality assurance and accreditation programs for all laboratories involved in lead testing to ensure data accuracy and international comparability.

Beyond technical skills, capacity building should also focus on strengthening policy analysis, regulatory impact assessment, and program management capabilities within relevant government agencies. This will enable officials to develop, implement, and adapt the national strategy effectively over the long term.

Fostering national research capabilities on local lead exposure pathways, the effectiveness of interventions, and the long-term health and economic impacts of lead exposure in the Bhutanese context is also crucial. Supporting local researchers and creating a "community of practice" or a national network for professionals working on lead (researchers, clinicians, public health officials, environmental officers) could foster knowledge sharing, collaboration, and innovation, helping to build and retain national expertise.

Bhutan should continue to seek technical assistance and partnerships with international organizations like WHO, UNICEF, and the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), as well as with countries that have successful lead prevention programs, to support these capacity-building efforts.13

IV. Charting the Course: Actionable Interventions and Implementation Plan

Translating the strategic pillars into concrete actions requires a detailed implementation plan. This section outlines specific interventions, legislative reforms, and institutional mechanisms necessary to achieve a lead-safe Bhutan.

A. Legislative and Regulatory Reforms: Setting Standards, Ensuring Compliance

The development and enactment of comprehensive lead control regulations are foundational. The process, guided by the UNICEF-supported national consultant 2, should include:

Comprehensive Review: A thorough desk review of existing Bhutanese laws, policies (e.g., Medicines Act 2003 26, environmental regulations 16), and international best practices in lead control.27

Gap Analysis: Identification of specific gaps in Bhutan's current regulatory framework concerning lead in all relevant media and products.

Drafting Regulations: Formulation of new, specific regulations establishing permissible lead levels in ambient air, drinking water, soil, and a wide range of consumer products, including but not limited to:

Paint: A mandatory limit of 90 ppm for lead in all paints (decorative, industrial, artistic).9

Toys and Children's Products: Strict limits, potentially also 90 ppm or aligned with stringent international standards. The NBLLS used a 100 ppm reference for toys.6

Jinlab and Other Traditional Medicines: A very low limit, such as the 2.5 ppm reference used in NBLLS 4, or lower if technically feasible for essential traditional medicines, with clear labeling requirements.

Spices and Food Items: A limit of 2.5 ppm or lower, consistent with international food safety standards for heavy metals.4

Cosmetics: Limits such as the 10 ppm reference used in NBLLS 6 or stricter based on product type and use.

Kitchen Utensils and Food Contact Materials: Standards to prevent lead leaching, potentially using the 100 ppm reference for total lead content in materials as a starting point.6

Drinking Water: Adherence to WHO guideline value for lead in drinking water.

Soil: Standards for lead in soil, particularly in areas frequented by children (playgrounds, schoolyards), possibly using the 200 ppm reference from NBLLS.6

Stakeholder Consultation: Extensive consultations with all relevant government agencies, industry representatives (manufacturers, importers, retailers), civil society organizations, academic institutions, and the public to ensure regulations are practical, enforceable, and have broad support.

Finalization and Enactment: Formal adoption and enactment of the finalized regulations.

The "reference thresholds" used in the NBLLS 2024 report 6 provide a useful starting point for discussion on these standards. However, these are not yet legally binding limits. The regulation development process must formally establish these standards, justifying them based on health risks, technical feasibility, international norms, and Bhutan's specific context.

Table 3: Proposed Regulatory Standards for Lead in Key Consumer Products and Environmental Media

Product/Media	Proposed Bhutan Standard (ppm unless specified)	International Benchmark/WHO Guideline	Rationale/Source
Paint	90	90 ppm (WHO, Global Alliance to Eliminate Lead Paint) 9	Prevent childhood exposure from paint chips and dust.
Toys & Children's Products	90 (or 100 as per NBLLS ref.)	Various international standards (e.g., EU, USA often target 90 ppm for surface coatings)	High risk due to children's mouthing behavior. NBLLS used 100 ppm reference.6
Jinlab & Traditional Meds.	2.5	NBLLS reference threshold for consumables.4 Some pharmacopoeias have limits for heavy metals.	Direct ingestion, high contamination found. Requires careful consideration of traditional production.
Spices & Other Foods	2.5	NBLLS reference threshold for consumables.4 Codex Alimentarius sets some limits.	Prevent dietary lead intake.
Cosmetics	10	NBLLS reference threshold.6 Some countries have specific limits (e.g., Canada 10 ppm).	Dermal absorption and accidental ingestion.
Kitchen Utensils (material)	100 (or based on leachability)	NBLLS reference threshold for total content.6 Some standards focus on lead migration.	Prevent lead leaching into food.
Drinking Water	10 μg/L	WHO Guideline Value (10 μg/L)	Protect population from lead in drinking water.
Soil (children's play areas)	200	NBLLS reference threshold.6 EPA (USA) has screening levels (e.g., 400 ppm residential).	Prevent exposure from contaminated soil in high-contact areas.
Ambient Air	0.5 μg/m3 (annual average)	WHO Air Quality Guideline	Protect population from inhaling airborne lead.

Robust enforcement mechanisms are critical. This includes:

Regular inspections of manufacturing facilities, import consignments, and retail outlets.

Product testing by accredited laboratories to verify compliance.

Clear penalties for non-compliance, sufficient to deter violations.

Strengthened import controls by customs officials, including screening and testing of high-risk imported goods.

The existing Mines and Minerals Management Act (MMMA) 1995 and related environmental regulations for mining need to be reviewed and updated to specifically address the prevention and control of lead and other heavy metal pollution, incorporating recommendations from assessments like the IGF Mining Policy Framework Assessment for Bhutan, which highlighted gaps in monitoring and the need for a modernized legal framework.16

Effective enforcement will necessitate significant capacity building for inspectorates within agencies like the BFDA, CCAA, NECS, and Customs, alongside the development of accredited national testing laboratories. Without this, even well-drafted regulations will remain ineffective.

B. Tackling Key Exposure Pathways: Specific Strategies for Jinlab, Spices, Paint, and Other Priority Sources

Targeted interventions are required for the specific sources identified as major contributors to lead exposure in Bhutan.

Jinlab:

Engage proactively with Menjong Sorig Pharmaceuticals, the Central Monastic Body, and other producers of traditional medicines to identify the precise sources of lead in ingredients (e.g., specific minerals or herbs) or contamination during processing (e.g., from vessels or equipment).4

Support research into and promote the adoption of lead-free formulations and safe production methods that maintain the cultural and spiritual significance of Jinlab.

Develop a system for testing and certification of Jinlab batches to assure safety.

Implement public awareness campaigns, in collaboration with religious leaders, regarding the risks of specific Jinlab batches if found to have high lead content, and provide guidance on safer alternatives.

Formulate a strategy for the safe collection and disposal or management of existing stocks of high-lead Jinlab to prevent further exposure. A "harm reduction" approach, focusing on making Jinlab safer rather than an outright ban, may be more culturally acceptable and effective.

Spices:

Conduct nationwide market surveillance of commonly consumed spices (e.g., turmeric, chili powder) to identify brands and sources with high lead levels.

Implement trace-back investigations for contaminated batches to pinpoint whether adulteration or contamination occurs at the point of import, local processing, or packaging.

The BFDA and CCAA must take strong enforcement action against vendors and producers of adulterated spices.4

Promote good agricultural practices (GAPs) and good manufacturing practices (GMPs) for local spice production to minimize contamination from soil or processing.

Paint:

Formally adopt and rigorously enforce a mandatory standard of 90 ppm total lead content for all paints manufactured, imported, sold, or used in Bhutan.13

Provide technical support and incentives to any local paint manufacturers to reformulate their products to meet this standard, utilizing resources like the Lead Paint Reformulation Technical Guidelines.13

Conduct awareness campaigns for consumers, painters, contractors, and hardware stores about the dangers of lead paint and the availability and importance of using lead-safe paints.

Kitchenware:

Educate the public about the potential risks from certain types of traditional brass, aluminum, or improperly glazed ceramic cookware, especially when used with acidic foods.4

Promote the use of certified lead-free cookware (e.g., stainless steel, glass, certified ceramics).

Establish standards and conduct testing for lead content and leachability in both locally made and imported kitchenware.

Toys and School Items:

Enforce strict lead limits (e.g., 90 ppm or 100 ppm) in all toys, children's jewelry, and school supplies.6

Implement regular market surveillance and establish a system for product recalls of non-compliant items.

Drinking Water:

The National Environment Commission Secretariat (NECS), which monitors water quality 23, should expand testing to assess lead levels in drinking water sources and distribution systems, particularly in older buildings, schools, and areas with aging infrastructure where lead pipes or fittings might exist.9

If lead contamination in drinking water is identified as an issue, implement corrective measures such as replacing lead service lines or fixtures, and provide guidance on flushing taps before use.17

Soil:

Identify potential lead-contaminated hotspots, such as areas around old buildings with lead paint, former industrial sites, or near busy roads (from past use of leaded gasoline).

Prioritize testing and, if necessary, remediation (e.g., soil replacement, covering with clean soil or barriers) in children's play areas, schoolyards, and residential gardens.12

E-waste and Industrial/Informal Sector Sources:

Develop and implement comprehensive regulations for the environmentally sound management of e-waste, including collection, dismantling, recycling, and disposal, to prevent lead release.2

Strengthen environmental impact assessment requirements, emission standards, and monitoring for industries with potential lead emissions or waste (e.g., battery recycling if it occurs, mining operations).16

Address lead exposure risks in the informal sector (e.g., informal recycling, small-scale craft production using lead-containing materials 9) through targeted outreach, provision of safer alternatives, and integration into local governance and waste management systems. This sector's diffuse nature poses unique regulatory challenges.

C. Enhancing Healthcare System Response: From Early Detection to Comprehensive Care

The healthcare system is the frontline for identifying lead-exposed individuals, providing care, and counseling families.

Screening Guidelines: Develop and disseminate national guidelines for BLL screening. Following international recommendations 12, all children should be tested at ages 1 and 2 years, with annual risk assessments for lead exposure conducted by their doctor for children up to 6 years. Pregnant women should be assessed for lead exposure risk at their first prenatal visit, with BLL testing if risk factors are present.12

Confirmatory Testing: Establish protocols for confirmatory venous blood testing when initial capillary tests indicate elevated BLLs, with timelines based on the level detected (e.g., within 48 hours for BLLs ≥45 μg/dL, within 2 weeks for BLLs 20-44 μg/dL).18

Clinical Management Protocols: Implement clear, evidence-based clinical management protocols based on confirmed BLLs, adapting CDC 18 and WHO 7 guidelines:

BLL <3.5 μg/dL: Provide education on lead sources and prevention; counsel on diet rich in iron, calcium, and Vitamin C; ensure routine developmental monitoring and follow-up BLL testing as per age-based schedules.

BLL 3.5-19 μg/dL: All actions for <3.5 μg/dL, plus: report to public health authorities; obtain a detailed environmental exposure history; conduct testing for iron deficiency and provide supplementation if needed; perform thorough developmental screening and refer for early intervention services if delays are detected; arrange for environmental investigation of the home if feasible and indicated; schedule follow-up BLL testing at recommended intervals.

BLL 20-44 μg/dL: All actions for 3.5-19 μg/dL, plus: perform a complete medical history and physical examination for signs/symptoms of lead poisoning; arrange for a formal environmental investigation and lead hazard reduction program; consider an abdominal X-ray for recent ingestion of lead-containing objects (especially in young children with pica) and initiate bowel decontamination if indicated; consult with a pediatric environmental health specialist or poison control center.

BLL ≥45 μg/dL: All actions for 20-44 μg/dL, plus: perform a detailed neurological exam; initiate chelation therapy under the guidance of an experienced medical toxicologist or pediatrician, potentially in a hospital setting, especially if symptoms of lead encephalopathy are present or if a safe, lead-free environment cannot be assured post-treatment.

Chelation Agents & Expertise: Ensure the availability of appropriate chelation agents (e.g., DMSA, CaNa2EDTA) and train medical specialists in their safe and effective administration.

Nutritional Support: Strengthen nutritional counseling for families of lead-exposed children, emphasizing foods rich in iron, calcium, and Vitamin C, which can help reduce lead absorption and mitigate some of its effects.17 Refer families to programs like WIC (or Bhutanese equivalents) if available.

Developmental Support: Ensure that all children with elevated BLLs receive comprehensive developmental screening, and those with identified delays are referred to appropriate early intervention programs and support services.5

Health Worker Training: Implement nationwide training programs for all levels of healthcare workers (doctors, pediatricians, nurses, health assistants, Village Health Workers) on lead poisoning (sources, health effects, screening, diagnosis, management, prevention, and risk communication).4

Laboratory Capacity: Upgrade national and regional laboratory facilities with appropriate equipment (e.g., atomic absorption spectrometers or ICP-MS) and trained personnel for timely and accurate BLL analysis.4 Implement quality control and external quality assurance schemes.

The successful rollout of widespread screening, particularly in a country with Bhutan's rugged terrain and resource limitations 14, will heavily rely on the capacity of primary healthcare facilities and the crucial outreach of VHWs. The strategy must include specific plans for equipping and supporting these frontline services.

D. National Communication Strategy: Educating and Engaging the Public

A dynamic and sustained national communication strategy is essential to raise awareness, promote behavioral change, and build public support for lead prevention efforts.

Strategy Development: Develop a National Lead Poisoning Prevention Communication Strategy, drawing on UNICEF's "Lead-Free Future Toolkit" 10 and successful campaigns in other LMICs.10

Target Audiences: Identify and segment key audiences: pregnant women, parents and caregivers of young children, monastic communities (leaders, residents, students), healthcare providers, teachers and school administrators, industry (manufacturers, importers of relevant goods), policymakers, and the general public.

Key Messages: Develop culturally appropriate, easily understandable, and actionable messages for each audience, covering:

The severe and irreversible health risks of lead, especially to children's brain development and learning abilities.

Common local sources of lead in Bhutan (e.g., Jinlab, certain spices, traditional cookware, old paint, some toys, contaminated soil).

Simple, low-cost preventive measures (e.g., frequent handwashing, especially before meals and after outdoor play; regular wet cleaning of floors, windowsills, and toys; dietary advice on iron, calcium, and Vitamin C; avoiding or safely managing known lead sources).

The importance of BLL testing for children and pregnant women, and where to access these services.

Information on safer alternatives for products known to contain lead.

Communication Channels: Utilize a multi-channel approach:

Mass Media: Radio (still widely accessed), television (BBS), newspapers (e.g., Kuensel 4), and online news portals.

Social Media: Platforms popular in Bhutan for targeted campaigns and youth engagement.

Community-Level: Town hall meetings, workshops, dissemination of IEC materials (posters, brochures, leaflets in Dzongkha and other local languages) through health facilities, schools, monastic institutions, and local government offices.

Interpersonal Communication: Training healthcare providers, VHWs 14, teachers, and religious leaders to serve as trusted sources of information and counsel within their communities. Communication regarding Jinlab requires particular sensitivity, leveraging respected religious figures to convey messages about safety and endorse lead-free alternatives to avoid alienating communities or creating distrust in traditional practices.8

Addressing Misinformation: Proactively address any misinformation or harmful traditional beliefs related to lead with factual, empathetic, and culturally sensitive communication.

Transparency: Regularly share findings from the NBLLS, progress on the implementation of the national strategy, and updates on BLL trends with the public to build trust and maintain engagement.

Consumer Empowerment: Include components in the communication strategy to empower consumers to inquire about the lead content of products and demand safer alternatives, thereby creating market incentives for businesses to comply with lead standards. The CCAA can support this through its consumer education programs.20

E. Institutional Mechanisms: The Role of a National Lead Prevention Task Force

Effective coordination across multiple sectors is paramount for the success of this strategy.

Formal Establishment of Task Force: Formally establish the National Lead Prevention Task Force, as proposed by the Ministry of Health and recommended in the NBLLS.4 This body will be the primary driver and coordinator of the strategy.

Mandate and Leadership: Provide the Task Force with a clear, high-level mandate, strong political backing (ideally chaired by a Minister or equivalent), and a dedicated secretariat with full-time staff and an operational budget to ensure effective functioning and follow-through.

Composition: Ensure comprehensive representation from all key stakeholder groups as outlined in Pillar 5 (Section III.E).

Roles and Responsibilities: Clearly define the roles, responsibilities, and contributions of each member agency within the Task Force framework, ensuring accountability.

Table 4: Roles and Responsibilities of Key Stakeholders in the National Lead Prevention Strategy

Stakeholder Agency	Key Responsibilities in Lead Prevention
Ministry of Health (MoH)	Overall lead agency for strategy coordination; BLL surveillance; clinical guideline development & training; health worker capacity building; public health risk communication; oversight of Jinlab safety in coordination with traditional medicine bodies.
National Environment Commission Secretariat (NECS)	Development and enforcement of environmental lead standards (air, water, soil); monitoring environmental lead levels; regulation of lead in industrial emissions and waste (including mining); e-waste management policy.
Competition and Consumer Affairs Authority (CCAA)	Market surveillance for lead in non-food consumer products (toys, paint, utensils, cosmetics); enforcement of product safety standards; consumer protection and education; addressing misleading claims.
Bhutan Food and Drug Authority (BFDA)	Regulation and enforcement of lead limits in food, spices, Jinlab and other traditional medicines, and food contact materials; import control for these products; laboratory testing for food/drug safety.
Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Employment (MoICE)	Engagement with industries on reformulation and compliance; promoting lead-safe manufacturing practices; managing import/export controls related to lead-containing raw materials and finished goods (in coordination with Customs).
Department of Revenue and Customs	Enforcement of import restrictions and standards for lead-containing products at borders; collection of data on imported goods.
Ministry of Education and Skills Development (MoESD)	Integrating lead safety into school curricula; ensuring lead-safe environments in schools (paint, toys, soil, water); awareness programs for students and teachers.
Department of Local Governance (DLG)	Facilitating implementation of lead prevention activities at Dzongkhag, Gewog, and Thromde levels; supporting community awareness and mobilization; oversight of local waste management.
Central Monastic Body & other Religious Institutions	Collaboration on ensuring safety of Jinlab and other religious items; disseminating awareness messages within monastic communities and to the public; promoting lead-free traditional practices.
Gross National Happiness Commission (GNHC)	Integrating lead prevention indicators into national development plans and GNH monitoring frameworks; advocating for resource allocation.
Private Sector (Manufacturers, Importers, Retailers)	Compliance with lead standards; reformulation of products; responsible sourcing of materials; cooperation with regulatory agencies.
Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) & Academia	Advocacy; community mobilization; independent monitoring; research; technical support.
International Partners (UNICEF, WHO, etc.)	Technical assistance; financial support; capacity building; sharing global best practices.

Coordination Mechanisms: Establish clear protocols for inter-agency communication, data sharing (e.g., BLL data, product testing results, environmental monitoring data), joint planning of activities, and mechanisms for resolving any inter-agency conflicts or overlaps in jurisdiction.

Oversight and Reporting: The Task Force will oversee the implementation of all aspects of the National Strategy, monitor progress against defined indicators, and report regularly to the government and the public.

F. Capacity Development: Strengthening Technical Expertise and Infrastructure

Building sustainable national capacity is crucial for the long-term success and ownership of the lead prevention program.

Comprehensive Capacity Assessment: Conduct a detailed national assessment of existing capacities and needs related to lead poisoning prevention, covering human resources (toxicologists, epidemiologists, lab technicians, inspectors), laboratory infrastructure and equipment, research capabilities, and institutional frameworks.

Human Resource Development Plan: Based on the assessment, develop and implement a long-term plan:

Specialized Training: Provide advanced training (including degree programs or fellowships abroad if necessary) for professionals in key areas such as clinical toxicology, environmental epidemiology, analytical chemistry (for lead detection in various matrices), risk assessment, and regulatory enforcement.4

Curriculum Integration: Work with Bhutan's academic and vocational training institutions to integrate modules on lead poisoning, chemical safety, and environmental health into the pre-service curricula for medical doctors, nurses, health assistants, environmental health officers, and laboratory scientists.5

Laboratory Infrastructure Upgrade:

BLL Testing: Equip the National Reference Laboratory (e.g., Royal Centre for Disease Control) and key regional hospital laboratories with modern, accurate instrumentation for BLL analysis (e.g., GFAAS or ICP-MS).

Environmental & Product Testing: Provide relevant agencies (e.g., BFDA, NECS, CCAA) with equipment for testing lead in paint, toys, food, soil, water, and other consumer products. This includes portable XRF analyzers for rapid field screening 5, complemented by confirmatory laboratory methods.

Quality Assurance: Establish robust internal quality control procedures and participate in external quality assurance/proficiency testing programs for all laboratories conducting lead analysis to ensure data reliability and international comparability. Seek laboratory accreditation where feasible.

Policy and Program Management Skills: Capacity building should also target strengthening skills in policy analysis, development of technical standards, regulatory impact assessment, program planning, and M&E within government agencies.

Research Support: Provide funding and support for national research on local lead exposure pathways, the efficacy of interventions in the Bhutanese context, the economic burden of lead poisoning, and long-term health outcomes.

International Collaboration: Actively seek and leverage technical assistance, training opportunities, and partnerships with international organizations (WHO, UNICEF, UNEP, EPA 13), regional networks, and countries with established lead prevention programs to accelerate capacity development.

V. Roadmap to a Lead-Free Future: Phasing, Resources, and Monitoring

A strategic approach to implementation, coupled with adequate resources and a robust monitoring framework, will be essential to navigate the path towards a lead-free Bhutan.

A. Phased Implementation Plan: Short, Medium, and Long-Term Priorities

The National Lead Prevention Strategy will be implemented in a phased manner to ensure manageability, allow for adaptive learning, and build momentum through early successes.

Phase 1: Short-Term (0-1 Year) - Foundation and Urgent Actions

Governance: Formally establish and operationalize the National Lead Prevention Task Force with clear Terms of Reference and inter-agency representation.

Awareness & Urgent Source Control: Launch intensive public awareness campaigns focusing on the most immediate risks identified in the NBLLS, particularly lead in Jinlab and spices. Initiate collaborative dialogues with Jinlab producers and religious bodies for immediate safety improvements.4 Begin expanded testing of spices and take initial market actions for highly contaminated products.

Regulatory Development: Commence the consultancy for developing comprehensive lead control regulations, including the initial desk review and gap analysis.2

Screening & Clinical Preparedness: Initiate targeted BLL screening in highest-risk populations (e.g., children in Dzongkhags with highest mean BLLs 6, specific age cohorts) and pregnant women. Begin training healthcare workers on basic lead awareness, identification of high-risk individuals, and referral pathways. Develop initial clinical guidance.

Capacity Assessment: Conduct a comprehensive national capacity needs assessment for lead poisoning prevention.

Phase 2: Medium-Term (1-3 Years) - Scaling Up and System Strengthening

Legislation & Enforcement: Enact initial lead regulations (e.g., for paint, toys, Jinlab, spices) and begin phased enforcement. Develop enforcement protocols and train inspectorates.

Surveillance & Screening: Scale up BLL screening programs to achieve broader national coverage for children and pregnant women. Establish a systematic BLL surveillance system.

Clinical Management: Finalize and disseminate comprehensive national clinical management guidelines for lead poisoning. Ensure availability of necessary medical supplies, including chelation agents where indicated. Conduct in-depth training for clinical staff.

Source Control Expansion: Implement broader source control measures for other identified risks (e.g., kitchenware, e-waste management strategies, initial assessment of lead in drinking water infrastructure).

Capacity Building: Roll out comprehensive training programs for laboratory personnel, environmental health officers, and regulatory staff. Begin integration of lead poisoning into pre-service professional curricula.

Public Awareness: Sustain and adapt public awareness campaigns based on initial feedback and emerging data.

Phase 3: Long-Term (3-5+ Years) - Consolidation and Sustainability

Full Enforcement & Compliance: Achieve full enforcement of all lead-related regulations with robust monitoring of compliance across all sectors.

Ongoing Surveillance & M&E: Maintain ongoing national surveillance of BLLs in vulnerable populations and lead levels in environmental media and consumer products. Conduct periodic evaluations of the National Strategy's effectiveness.

Sustained Prevention: Continue public awareness and education efforts to maintain vigilance and promote lead-safe behaviors.

Research & Adaptation: Foster national research on lead exposure, long-term health impacts, and the cost-effectiveness of interventions. Regularly review and update the National Strategy based on M&E findings, new scientific evidence, and emerging challenges.

Sustainable Capacity: Ensure that national capacity for all aspects of lead poisoning prevention (technical, regulatory, clinical, research) is self-sustaining.

This phased approach must remain flexible. The short-term phase, by prioritizing visible actions on alarming findings like lead in Jinlab, can build public trust and government commitment, creating momentum for the more complex, systemic changes required in later phases. The M&E framework (Section V.C) will be crucial for informing any necessary adaptations to this timeline.

Table 5: Phased Implementation Roadmap: Key Actions, Lead Agencies, and Indicative Timelines

Phase	Key Action/Initiative	Primary Responsible Agency(ies)	Key Performance Indicator(s)	Indicative Timeline
Short-Term (0-1 Year)	Establish National Lead Prevention Task Force	MoH, Office of Prime Minister	Task Force operational with ToR	0-3 months
ㅤ	Launch urgent awareness campaigns (Jinlab, spices)	MoH, BFDA, Religious Bodies	% population aware of key risks	0-12 months
ㅤ	Initiate lead control regulation development	MoH, Consultant, Task Force	Draft regulations developed	6-12 months
ㅤ	Commence targeted BLL screening (high-risk groups)	MoH	# children/PW screened in target areas	6-12 months
ㅤ	Urgent actions for Jinlab/spice safety	BFDA, MoH, Producers	% Jinlab/spice samples meeting interim safety advice	3-12 months
Medium-Term (1-3 Years)	Enact & begin enforcement of initial lead regulations	MoH, BFDA, CCAA, NECS	Key lead regulations gazetted; # inspections conducted	12-36 months
ㅤ	Scale up national BLL screening & surveillance	MoH	% national coverage for child screening	12-36 months
ㅤ	Implement comprehensive clinical management guidelines	MoH	# health facilities using guidelines	12-24 months
ㅤ	Strengthen lab capacity for lead testing	MoH, BFDA, NECS	# accredited tests available in-country	12-36 months
Long-Term (3-5+ Years)	Full enforcement of all lead regulations	All regulatory agencies	% compliance with lead standards	36+ months
ㅤ	Ongoing national BLL & environmental surveillance	MoH, NECS	Annual surveillance reports published	36+ months
ㅤ	Regular review & update of National Strategy	Task Force, MoH	Strategy updated based on M&E	Every 3-5 years

B. Resource Mobilization and Strategic Investments

Implementing this comprehensive strategy will require significant and sustained financial and human resources.

Cost Estimation: A detailed costing exercise should be undertaken by the National Task Force to estimate the financial resources needed for each component of the strategy, including personnel, training programs, laboratory equipment and consumables, public awareness campaigns, monitoring systems, and research activities.

Funding Sources:

National Budget: Advocacy for increased national budget allocations to lead poisoning prevention is paramount. This advocacy should frame lead prevention not merely as a health expenditure but as a critical economic investment that yields substantial returns through improved child development, higher educational attainment, increased future productivity, and reduced long-term healthcare costs.3 Highlighting the economic losses due to lead exposure can strengthen the case for domestic funding.

International Development Partners: Bhutan should actively engage with international partners such as UNICEF, WHO, the World Bank, and regional development banks for financial and technical support. These organizations have a track record of supporting maternal and child health, environmental health, and capacity-building initiatives in Bhutan and globally.13

Bilateral Aid and Foundations: Explore opportunities for grants from bilateral aid agencies of countries with strong lead prevention programs, and from international philanthropic foundations that focus on child health, environmental protection, or sustainable development.

Strategic Linkages: The resource mobilization strategy should link lead poisoning prevention to Bhutan's overarching national priorities, including the pursuit of Gross National Happiness (GNH) and the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly those related to health (SDG 3), education (SDG 4), and sustainable environments (SDGs 11, 12).

Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): Where appropriate, explore PPPs. For instance, industries could be encouraged to invest in reformulating their products to meet lead-safe standards or contribute to research on safer alternatives. However, such partnerships must be managed transparently to avoid conflicts of interest.

Leveraging Existing Mechanisms: Existing financial mechanisms for health programs, such as the "1000 Golden Days initiative" 14, could potentially be expanded or adapted to channel funds towards specific lead prevention activities targeting mothers and children, ensuring efficient use of established financial pathways.

C. Framework for Monitoring, Evaluation, and Adaptive Management

A robust Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) framework is essential to track progress, assess effectiveness, ensure accountability, and facilitate adaptive management of the National Lead Prevention Strategy. The consultant developing lead regulations is also tasked with creating an M&E plan for those regulations 11, which should be integrated into this broader strategic M&E framework.

M&E Plan Development: The National Lead Prevention Task Force will be responsible for developing and overseeing the implementation of a comprehensive M&E plan. This plan will include:

Clear Objectives and Targets: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound (SMART) objectives and targets for each strategic pillar and key intervention.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): A balanced set of indicators to measure inputs, processes, outputs, outcomes, and impacts. Examples include:

Process Indicators: Number of lead-related regulations developed and enacted; number of healthcare workers, inspectors, and laboratory staff trained; number of products (e.g., paint, toys, spices) tested for lead content; number of public awareness campaigns conducted and reach achieved; number of households receiving lead safety education.

Outcome Indicators: Reduction in the geometric mean BLLs in children aged 1-6 years and pregnant women (nationally and in high-risk areas); percentage increase in children receiving BLL screening at recommended ages; percentage increase in products meeting lead safety standards available on the market; measurable improvements in public knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding lead poisoning prevention; number of successful enforcement actions against non-compliant products/industries.

Impact Indicators (Longer-Term): Reduction in the prevalence of developmental delays and anemia attributable to lead exposure in children; improvements in cognitive scores and school readiness in young children in formerly high-exposure areas (requires baseline and follow-up cohort studies).

Data Collection Methods and Sources: Define how, when, and by whom data for each indicator will be collected (e.g., routine health system data, BLL surveillance system, market surveys, environmental monitoring, knowledge-attitude-practice (KAP) surveys, laboratory testing records).

Data Analysis and Reporting: Establish protocols for regular data analysis, interpretation, and reporting to the Task Force, relevant government bodies, and the public.

Baseline Data: The NBLLS 2024 provides a critical baseline for many BLL and source contamination indicators.1 Baselines for other indicators (e.g., public awareness, current regulatory compliance) will need to be established early in the strategy implementation.

Regular Reviews and Adaptive Management: The Task Force should conduct regular (e.g., annual or biennial) reviews of progress against the M&E plan. These reviews will identify successes, challenges, and lessons learned, enabling adaptive management—making necessary adjustments to strategies, interventions, or resource allocation based on evidence.

Community Feedback: The M&E framework should incorporate mechanisms for soliciting and integrating community feedback (e.g., through focus group discussions, surveys, feedback channels at health facilities) to assess the relevance, acceptability, and perceived effectiveness of interventions from the perspective of those most affected. This ensures the strategy remains responsive and culturally appropriate.

Evaluations: Plan for independent mid-term and end-term evaluations of the National Lead Prevention Strategy to provide objective assessments of its overall effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability.

Linkage to National Frameworks: To institutionalize lead prevention as an ongoing national priority, key lead-related indicators (e.g., mean child BLLs) should be integrated into Bhutan's existing national development planning processes and GNH monitoring frameworks. This ensures continued attention and resource allocation beyond the lifespan of this specific strategy document.

VI. Conclusion: Safeguarding Bhutan's Future Generations from Lead Poisoning

The evidence is unequivocal: lead poisoning poses a profound and urgent threat to the health and well-being of Bhutan's population, particularly its children. The findings of the 2024 National Blood Lead Level Survey have unveiled a crisis that demands immediate, decisive, and sustained action.1 This National Lead Prevention Strategy offers a comprehensive and actionable blueprint for the Royal Government of Bhutan to confront this challenge head-on.

The implementation of this strategy, built upon robust regulatory frameworks, targeted source control, strengthened public health responses, community empowerment, multi-sectoral collaboration, and sustainable national capacity, promises transformative benefits. By reducing lead exposure, Bhutan can protect the developing brains of its children, leading to improved cognitive function, enhanced educational outcomes, and greater opportunities for individual fulfillment. This, in turn, will contribute to a healthier, more skilled, and more productive populace, bolstering the nation's socio-economic development. Safeguarding citizens from this pervasive environmental toxin is also a direct and tangible contribution to the principles of Gross National Happiness, ensuring that development efforts genuinely enhance the well-being of all Bhutanese.

The path to a lead-safe Bhutan will require unwavering political commitment from the highest levels of government, dedicated resources, and the active participation of all sectors of society—from government agencies and religious bodies to private enterprises, civil society, and every community and family. The challenge is significant, given the pervasiveness of lead sources and the need for behavioral and systemic changes. However, it is a challenge that is solvable. Many countries around the world have successfully reduced or eliminated key sources of lead exposure, such as lead in gasoline and paint, demonstrating that with concerted effort, progress is achievable.9

Bhutan is globally recognized for its visionary leadership in environmental conservation and its unique development philosophy centered on the "Middle Path" and Gross National Happiness.24 Tackling lead poisoning is a natural and critical extension of this commitment—protecting the intricate connection between human health and environmental integrity. By embracing this strategy, Bhutan can not only safeguard its own citizens but also reinforce its standing as a nation dedicated to truly sustainable and holistic development.

The vision is clear: a lead-safe Bhutan where every child is born free from the insidious threat of lead poisoning and has the opportunity to reach their full God-given potential. Achieving this vision will be a testament to Bhutan's wisdom, compassion, and enduring commitment to the well-being of its present and future generations.

Works cited

National Blood Lead Level Survey Bhutan 2024 - Unicef, accessed May 16, 2025, https://www.unicef.org/bhutan/documents/national-blood-lead-level-survey-bhutan-2024

National Consultant to Develop Regulation on Prevention of Environmental Lead Exposure, accessed May 16, 2025, https://jobs.unicef.org/fr/job/581201/national-consultant-to-develop-regulation-on-prevention-of-environmental-lead-exposure

UNICEF National Consultant to Develop National Lead Prevention Strategy - UNjobnet, accessed May 16, 2025, https://www.unjobnet.org/jobs/detail/79230019

Bhutan's health ministry steps up efforts to reduce lead exposure - Asia News Network, accessed May 16, 2025, https://asianews.network/bhutans-health-ministry-steps-up-efforts-to-reduce-lead-exposure/

moh.gov.bt, accessed May 16, 2025, https://moh.gov.bt/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/National-Blood-Lead-Level-Survey.pdf

NATIONAL BLOOD LEAD LEVEL SURVEY FACTSHEET - Ministry of Health, accessed May 16, 2025, https://moh.gov.bt/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/BLS_Factsheet.pdf

WHO guidance to reduce illness due to lead exposure, accessed May 16, 2025, https://www.who.int/news/item/27-10-2021-who-guidance-to-reduce-illness-due-to-lead-exposure

Clear communication to prevent and address childhood lead poisoning, accessed May 16, 2025, https://www.leadfreefuture.org/sites/default/files/2025-03/250314%20UNICEF%20Lead%20Toolkit%205.pdf

Lead | UNEP - UN Environment Programme, accessed May 16, 2025, https://www.unep.org/topics/chemicals-and-pollution-action/pollution-and-health/heavy-metals/lead

Clear communication to prevent and address childhood lead ..., accessed May 16, 2025, https://ceh.unicef.org/sites/default/files/2025-03/250314%20UNICEF%20Lead%20Toolkit%205.pdf

National Consultant to Develop Regulation on Prevention of Environmental Lead Exposure, accessed May 16, 2025, https://untalent.org/jobs/national-consultant-to-develop-regulation-on-prevention-of-environmental-lead-exposure

Lead Poisoning Prevention - NYC Health, accessed May 16, 2025, https://www.nyc.gov/site/doh/health/health-topics/lead-poisoning-prevention.page

EPA International Cooperation on Lead Pollution | US EPA, accessed May 16, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/epa-international-cooperation-lead-pollution

Bhutan renews focus on maternal and child health - Asia News ..., accessed May 16, 2025, https://asianews.network/bhutan-renews-focus-on-maternal-and-child-health/

National Consultant to Develop Regulation on Prevention of Environmental Lead Exposure, accessed May 16, 2025, https://jobs.unicef.org/es/job/581201/national-consultant-to-develop-regulation-on-prevention-of-environmental-lead-exposure

www.iisd.org, accessed May 16, 2025, https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2025-03/bhutan-mining-policy-framework-assessment.pdf

Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention - New York State Department of Health, accessed May 16, 2025, https://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/lead/

Recommended Actions Based on Blood Lead Level | Childhood ..., accessed May 16, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/lead-prevention/hcp/clinical-guidance/index.html

Tool 5: Clear communication to prevent and address childhood lead poisoning | Knowledge, accessed May 16, 2025, https://knowledge.unicef.org/resource/tool-5-clear-communication-prevent-and-address-childhood-lead-poisoning

CCAA, accessed May 16, 2025, https://ccaa.gov.bt/

Patient safety issues and concerns in Bhutan's healthcare system: a qualitative exploratory descriptive study, accessed May 16, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6067340/

Patient safety issues and concerns in Bhutan's healthcare system: a qualitative exploratory descriptive study | BMJ Open, accessed May 16, 2025, https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/7/e022788

FAQs - National Environment Commission, accessed May 16, 2025, http://www.nec.gov.bt/faq/water-resources

The Middle Path - FAOLEX Database, accessed May 16, 2025, https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/bhu207785.pdf

Competition and Consumer Affairs Authority, accessed May 16, 2025, https://www.consumersinternational.org/members/members/competition-and-consumer-affairs-authority/

BHUTAN MEDICINES RULES AND REGULATION 2019, accessed May 16, 2025, https://bhutan.eregulations.org/media/Final%20BMR%202019.pdf

Full country data - World Health Organization (WHO), accessed May 16, 2025, https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/gho-documents/public-health-and-environment/phe-lead-regulations-database-20201008.xlsx?sfvrsn=44ff7016_2